Will the rightwing loons try a coup d’etat?
Aug.29, 2009 in
barack obama
More and more each day, we hear people like Michelle Bachman inciting conservatives to stock up on guns and ammo and launch the revolution against Obama. Will they really do it?
It wouldnt be the first time. The first rightwing attempt to overthrow the government was driven by an alliance of big business and army veterans. The Liberty League consisted of very rich men in the 1930s who loathed FDR. They included leaders from DuPont, GM, EF Hutton, General Foods, GM, Montgomery Ward, JP Morgan, the Hearst newspapers, Lehigh University, Princeton, Yale, U.S. Steel, Standard Oil (Exxon), Chase National Bank, Goodyear, Birdseye Foods, Colgate, Heinz, Mutual Life...and Prescott Bush. Some Democratic leaders belonged. The group was so powerful that even New York Times gave them dozens of positive front-page stories. Prefiguring todays rightwingers, they screeched that FDRs policies betokened "a trend toward Fascist control," and the end of democracy." Their aim was to use WWI veterans to overthrow FDR so the fatcats could put their own man in. Their first choice to lead the charge was Douglas MacArthur, but the veterans hated him because he had crushed the Bonus Army march a year or two earlier, so they turned instead to another general, Smedley Butler, who (luckily for us all) had the good sense to blow the whistle on these loons in Congress.
The dilemma for any revolutionary terror group (or any other criminal enterprise) is how big the group gets. Too small, and they have no chance of setting up a national organization and taking over the country. Too big, and the law can infiltrate it, recruit its members as informants, and track its members to figure out who is connected to whom. Once the FBI has your group on a big wall chart with pictures and lines, youre toast. Even before Oklahoma and 911, the FBI was watching these people. The Klan was successfully infiltrated under COINTELPRO, and eventually lost the Michael Donald case and the Jordan Gruver case. The Order, modeled on The Turner Diaries (the Bible of the loony right), was broken up under RICO. The neo-Nazis were blocked, in court, from marching in Skokie. Aryan Nations lost the Keenan suit and split up. The White Aryan Resistance lost the Mulugeta Shaw case. The Michigan Militia simply fell apart after Oklahoma, while the Indiana Militia hung on by distancing itself from the real kooks. Some of these guys actually had to get help from the hated ACLU to defend them.
If they want to go small, the ultimate is the group of one, the lone wolf. Timothy McVeigh, Eric Rudolph and the Unabomber fit the profile. This model is difficult for law enforcement to crack for obvious reasons.
One model for solving this problem is found in The Turner Diaries, a novel which tells of governmental gun confiscation leading to rightwing guerrilla attacks, the overthrow of the government, attacks on the media (presumably Lou Dobbs would get a free pass), and the extermination of nonwhites. Reportedly it has sold more than half a million copies. The guy who dragged a black man to death behind his truck was a fan of the book, and so was Timothy McVeigh, who may have modelled the Oklahoma attack on an attack on FBI headquarters depicted in the book. The key is that the book depicts a large national organization, managed by a secret inner cadre a small secure group inside a large national group.
Another enabler which makes both small groups and large groups dangerous is the internet. The net can help lone wolves set up their own operations and acquire materials, and it can help larger groups organize without as much external scrutiny. A site to watch is Stormfront, owned by a former Klan leader. Stormfront encouraged their followers to join the army to learn military skills, and set up stories for kids, and computer games allowing kids to kill blacks and Jews. They skilfully use texts from the U.S. Founding Fathers, the Bible, and even Darwin for their survival-of-the-fittest philosophy. They are a better fit for the new century that the Liberty-League model or the Klan model would have been. In April 2009 one of its members killed three Pittsburgh cops and tried to kill nine more. Even if Stormfront is not the vanguard for an outbreak of violence, it might be the model for whoever does launch the Crazy Season.
There are a number of key stressors that set these people off, mostly based on fear. First, fear of non-whites: years ago they went bonkers over the bussing issue, and now its immigration, affirmative action, urban crime, the growing non-white population in big states like California, and the notion that blacks and aliens are somehow to blame for the subprime meltdown. The day after Obama was elected, so many loons tried to hook up to Stormfront that they crashed the website. Second, fear that they will lose their guns: the Brady bill, the assault weapons ban. Third, fear of government: Waco, Ruby Ridge, government surveillance, the phantasm of the New World Order (and no one even knows what that means), some bizarre vision of a world government involving the UN, the Federal Reserve, a global currency, IMF SDRs etc (they dont even understand what Special Drawing Rights are, but somehow they know theyre evil). And lastly, moral issues abortion and gay marriage, although in that case the hate groups may simply be having sympathy pains for their fellow loons in the evangelical movement.
There are some groups which do not seem to be linked to all this, but could potentially link up later on: criminal groups (particularly the rural meth-lab crowd), survivalists, the Minuteman Project (due to the immigration issue), and even biker gangs. The spring 2009 tea party effort doesnt really fit into this pattern for a number of reasons: it is a tax revolt, not one of the far rights usual scare issues (and it came right after an Obama tax cut anyway); it is very open and public; and they seemed to be refusing to use the tea parties as recruiting tools for extremists, for fear of infiltration. One thing which the tax revolt nonsense does do for the really dangerous extremists, is lay the groundwork for recruiting later on, by spinning up as much mindless anger as they can.
Also, secessionists: last year 22 percent of Americans believed that a state has a right to secede from the United States. Sarah Palin supported an Alaskan secession group, and Mike Huckabees most valued supporters include secessionists as well. Some militia groups have been involved.
Watch the northwest in particular: when white separatists start mooning about setting up their own all-white utopia somewhere, separate from the United States, the talk usually revolves around any state within shouting distance of Montana. Also, obviously, watch the South. For a while there, some New England liberals were talking secession, but a lot of that was a reaction to Bush and Iraq, and now that the Iraq issue is resolving itself, such tree-hugging folk are unlikely to get in bed with the Obama-haters of the loony right.
One thing to watch on the map: spikes in unemployment. When you have a small army of poor white trash sitting at home with no jobs and lots of guns, the recruiters for the nut-fudge groups roar into action. Look for one-factory towns that are losing their factories, and obvious places like the Auto Belt in Michigan and throughout the Midwest.
Also, watch the gun shows. They are not known (yet) as hotbeds of extremist activity but they have been known to sell the Turner Diaries and they are linked to criminal activity as well. Easy networking tool.
The key thing to watch for, is the potential convergence of many or all of these elements: the rich, army veterans, lone wolves (who by definition are hard to monitor), existing extremist groups or survivors thereof, the websites, seemingly innocuous public protests, secessionists, gun shows, and outliers like the survivalists and Minutemen. The internet would be found near the center of the whole thing. When you see these groups starting to bump into each other in the news or on the net, stock up on canned goods.
Normally I would also watch for stressor events, but right now Obama himself is the stressor, like FDR before him: essentially the entire Obama administration is clearly going to set off gongs at Tin Foil HQ until the day he leaves office. Hes a black guy who is being forced by economic circumstances to expand the scope of government, and hes pro-choice and sympathetic to gays; although Obama (and his AG, also black) have repeatedly affirmed his support for the Second Amendment, and have tiptoed away from Obamas earlier rhetoric on assault weapons, the loons simply dont believe them, and are already collapsing into hysterics and stocking up on guns and ammo.
One thing working against the extremists, is that they may have waited too long. The popularity of Reagans mix of snake oil tax cuts for the fatcats, holy wars for the anti-abortion and anti-gay forces, brain-dead militarism and gun worship, contempt for the government began its arc across the sky in 1980 and crashed to earth in 2008. The exact mid-point the high-point of that parabolic arc was 1994, when they conquered Congress. At that point they should have launched the revolution. Instead, they launched Oklahoma, which backfired badly, and ensured Clintons landslide reelection. Now its a bit late in the day. The paradox of revolution is that when your ideas are in the ascendant, whipping up the anger among your hard-core adherents is difficult, but once your ideas are exposed as fallacious, everyone but the hard-core abandons you and the revolution wont go anywhere unless a million Joe Blows buy into it.
It wouldnt be the first time. The first rightwing attempt to overthrow the government was driven by an alliance of big business and army veterans. The Liberty League consisted of very rich men in the 1930s who loathed FDR. They included leaders from DuPont, GM, EF Hutton, General Foods, GM, Montgomery Ward, JP Morgan, the Hearst newspapers, Lehigh University, Princeton, Yale, U.S. Steel, Standard Oil (Exxon), Chase National Bank, Goodyear, Birdseye Foods, Colgate, Heinz, Mutual Life...and Prescott Bush. Some Democratic leaders belonged. The group was so powerful that even New York Times gave them dozens of positive front-page stories. Prefiguring todays rightwingers, they screeched that FDRs policies betokened "a trend toward Fascist control," and the end of democracy." Their aim was to use WWI veterans to overthrow FDR so the fatcats could put their own man in. Their first choice to lead the charge was Douglas MacArthur, but the veterans hated him because he had crushed the Bonus Army march a year or two earlier, so they turned instead to another general, Smedley Butler, who (luckily for us all) had the good sense to blow the whistle on these loons in Congress.
The dilemma for any revolutionary terror group (or any other criminal enterprise) is how big the group gets. Too small, and they have no chance of setting up a national organization and taking over the country. Too big, and the law can infiltrate it, recruit its members as informants, and track its members to figure out who is connected to whom. Once the FBI has your group on a big wall chart with pictures and lines, youre toast. Even before Oklahoma and 911, the FBI was watching these people. The Klan was successfully infiltrated under COINTELPRO, and eventually lost the Michael Donald case and the Jordan Gruver case. The Order, modeled on The Turner Diaries (the Bible of the loony right), was broken up under RICO. The neo-Nazis were blocked, in court, from marching in Skokie. Aryan Nations lost the Keenan suit and split up. The White Aryan Resistance lost the Mulugeta Shaw case. The Michigan Militia simply fell apart after Oklahoma, while the Indiana Militia hung on by distancing itself from the real kooks. Some of these guys actually had to get help from the hated ACLU to defend them.
If they want to go small, the ultimate is the group of one, the lone wolf. Timothy McVeigh, Eric Rudolph and the Unabomber fit the profile. This model is difficult for law enforcement to crack for obvious reasons.
One model for solving this problem is found in The Turner Diaries, a novel which tells of governmental gun confiscation leading to rightwing guerrilla attacks, the overthrow of the government, attacks on the media (presumably Lou Dobbs would get a free pass), and the extermination of nonwhites. Reportedly it has sold more than half a million copies. The guy who dragged a black man to death behind his truck was a fan of the book, and so was Timothy McVeigh, who may have modelled the Oklahoma attack on an attack on FBI headquarters depicted in the book. The key is that the book depicts a large national organization, managed by a secret inner cadre a small secure group inside a large national group.
Another enabler which makes both small groups and large groups dangerous is the internet. The net can help lone wolves set up their own operations and acquire materials, and it can help larger groups organize without as much external scrutiny. A site to watch is Stormfront, owned by a former Klan leader. Stormfront encouraged their followers to join the army to learn military skills, and set up stories for kids, and computer games allowing kids to kill blacks and Jews. They skilfully use texts from the U.S. Founding Fathers, the Bible, and even Darwin for their survival-of-the-fittest philosophy. They are a better fit for the new century that the Liberty-League model or the Klan model would have been. In April 2009 one of its members killed three Pittsburgh cops and tried to kill nine more. Even if Stormfront is not the vanguard for an outbreak of violence, it might be the model for whoever does launch the Crazy Season.
There are a number of key stressors that set these people off, mostly based on fear. First, fear of non-whites: years ago they went bonkers over the bussing issue, and now its immigration, affirmative action, urban crime, the growing non-white population in big states like California, and the notion that blacks and aliens are somehow to blame for the subprime meltdown. The day after Obama was elected, so many loons tried to hook up to Stormfront that they crashed the website. Second, fear that they will lose their guns: the Brady bill, the assault weapons ban. Third, fear of government: Waco, Ruby Ridge, government surveillance, the phantasm of the New World Order (and no one even knows what that means), some bizarre vision of a world government involving the UN, the Federal Reserve, a global currency, IMF SDRs etc (they dont even understand what Special Drawing Rights are, but somehow they know theyre evil). And lastly, moral issues abortion and gay marriage, although in that case the hate groups may simply be having sympathy pains for their fellow loons in the evangelical movement.
There are some groups which do not seem to be linked to all this, but could potentially link up later on: criminal groups (particularly the rural meth-lab crowd), survivalists, the Minuteman Project (due to the immigration issue), and even biker gangs. The spring 2009 tea party effort doesnt really fit into this pattern for a number of reasons: it is a tax revolt, not one of the far rights usual scare issues (and it came right after an Obama tax cut anyway); it is very open and public; and they seemed to be refusing to use the tea parties as recruiting tools for extremists, for fear of infiltration. One thing which the tax revolt nonsense does do for the really dangerous extremists, is lay the groundwork for recruiting later on, by spinning up as much mindless anger as they can.
Also, secessionists: last year 22 percent of Americans believed that a state has a right to secede from the United States. Sarah Palin supported an Alaskan secession group, and Mike Huckabees most valued supporters include secessionists as well. Some militia groups have been involved.
Watch the northwest in particular: when white separatists start mooning about setting up their own all-white utopia somewhere, separate from the United States, the talk usually revolves around any state within shouting distance of Montana. Also, obviously, watch the South. For a while there, some New England liberals were talking secession, but a lot of that was a reaction to Bush and Iraq, and now that the Iraq issue is resolving itself, such tree-hugging folk are unlikely to get in bed with the Obama-haters of the loony right.
One thing to watch on the map: spikes in unemployment. When you have a small army of poor white trash sitting at home with no jobs and lots of guns, the recruiters for the nut-fudge groups roar into action. Look for one-factory towns that are losing their factories, and obvious places like the Auto Belt in Michigan and throughout the Midwest.
Also, watch the gun shows. They are not known (yet) as hotbeds of extremist activity but they have been known to sell the Turner Diaries and they are linked to criminal activity as well. Easy networking tool.
The key thing to watch for, is the potential convergence of many or all of these elements: the rich, army veterans, lone wolves (who by definition are hard to monitor), existing extremist groups or survivors thereof, the websites, seemingly innocuous public protests, secessionists, gun shows, and outliers like the survivalists and Minutemen. The internet would be found near the center of the whole thing. When you see these groups starting to bump into each other in the news or on the net, stock up on canned goods.
Normally I would also watch for stressor events, but right now Obama himself is the stressor, like FDR before him: essentially the entire Obama administration is clearly going to set off gongs at Tin Foil HQ until the day he leaves office. Hes a black guy who is being forced by economic circumstances to expand the scope of government, and hes pro-choice and sympathetic to gays; although Obama (and his AG, also black) have repeatedly affirmed his support for the Second Amendment, and have tiptoed away from Obamas earlier rhetoric on assault weapons, the loons simply dont believe them, and are already collapsing into hysterics and stocking up on guns and ammo.
One thing working against the extremists, is that they may have waited too long. The popularity of Reagans mix of snake oil tax cuts for the fatcats, holy wars for the anti-abortion and anti-gay forces, brain-dead militarism and gun worship, contempt for the government began its arc across the sky in 1980 and crashed to earth in 2008. The exact mid-point the high-point of that parabolic arc was 1994, when they conquered Congress. At that point they should have launched the revolution. Instead, they launched Oklahoma, which backfired badly, and ensured Clintons landslide reelection. Now its a bit late in the day. The paradox of revolution is that when your ideas are in the ascendant, whipping up the anger among your hard-core adherents is difficult, but once your ideas are exposed as fallacious, everyone but the hard-core abandons you and the revolution wont go anywhere unless a million Joe Blows buy into it.

August 30th, 2009 at 7:15 am
There’s several major errors with this article. Of all the “Right Wing” commentators I listen to, Everyone’s problem with President Obama and his administration is based on idology, not on race. By dismissing it as a “racial” issue, you’ll only serve to anger your opponents further.
Second… The Michigan Militia IS STILL ACTIVE… Very active. Google “Militia” and we’re at the top. Look at our web site, which has been active and updated every month. We hold trainings and meetings EVERY month. Hardly the vision of a group that “fell apart”
Now, A word of caution. As you go forth, Address the issues we have. A simple dismissal will only aggrevate the right. AND… I’ve yet to hear anyone actually defending the charges we make.
“Mad Hatter”
County Rep,
Editor, MICHIGANMILITIA.COM
August 30th, 2009 at 9:53 am
So how are you gonna play this, “Mad”? The right-wing punditocrisy speaks continually in less-than-subtle racist terms, starting with Beck’s assetion of “deep-seated hatred of whites” in Obama. Then there’s the daily stream of racist posters, pictures, and “jokes” that are passed around among the right, often passing thru the hands of republican-conservative politicians. News flash; Obama’s policies aren’t all that radical; Bush/Cheney were far more aggressive in their assaults on our civil rights, and were clearly in the pocket of moneyed interests at the expense of the working slug. Your factory closed and your job gone overseas? Blame a Republican, not Obama.
Do you really want to advertise your militia, “Mad,” given the encroachment of the evil gov’ment on all things you hold dear? Just askin’.
And about your “word of caution”: I find it difficult to interpret this as anything other than a threat. Yours is the pathetic logic of the abuser and his codependent family: “don’t make daddy mad!” That fact that daddy is a pathetic human being who can only define himself by his control over others is never addressed.
What, precisely, are the “issues” you “have”? I interact with a fair number of right-wing folks on a daily basis, and their chronic inablility to express their concerns in a rational, factual, straightforward manner without resort to outright lies, straw-man arguments, maledictions, and implied threats suggests that they need some serious counseling.
No one addresses your “charges” because they are simply unaddressable. They are utterly without factual merit or logic and often display an outright contempt for the same. They fall into the category of adolescent “have you stopped beating your wife” queries or reflect a refusal to believe clear facts — see anti-global warming and Obama birth certificate rants — or are codes for race and gender issues, as in the unrelenting attacks on ACORN and affirmative action.
August 30th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
I thank you for the response and asking questions, direct questions that I can now answer. I really love debating issues like this. It is part of what makes this country work.
Straight down the list… Glenn Beck’s comment about the President’s race problems stem from Mr. Obama’s snap to judgement in declairing that professional, trained police officers, answering a call, behaved “stupidly” before he even had the facts of the case. This reaction is typical of the problems facing inner city residents and not the sort of reaction appropriate for America’s Leader. He’s surrounded by MANY people who follow a Black Nationalist/seperatist ideology, and even though Mr. Obama doesn’t spout these things, One does tend to get lumped into the company he keeps. Trust me, In my position, I understand the irony of this statement.
Now, As for my factory closing… I’m in the pharmaceutical business, Not on the manufacturing end, but on the distributing end. Government funded health care and prescriptions would be great for my business, But not so good for the nation. We just can’t afford it. I see how well it works in other nations, And how happy the people are with it. How will this mounting debt we already have get paid? Do we really want to throw another ten trillion on top of that? And why such a big rush that we can’t give our representatives time to read the damn thing before they vote on it?
I’ll be the first to admit that the Patriot Act sucks. It clamped down on travel and communications without offering any more security. But here’s what worries me… What has the new administration done to roll that back? If they leave it in place, Doesn’t that make them as guilty?
I’ve got no problem with advertising my group. The SPLC report has news crews from three networks coming out to learn about us this month. Whether you agree with us or not, Raising these issues and getting people talking about them is what will bring a “Bi-Partisan” solution.
And, My word of caution was meant just as it was presented. Many on my side think that forces within the government want to push a confrontation so that they can crack down on guns and militia’s the way they did after OKC. With media labeling everyone who disagrees with the President as a Racist, Gun-toting, terrorist extremist(Including the black man who broght a rifle to a protest?!?), You can see how the door for honest conversation gets slammed shut.
We are not racist. I’m Cherokee Indian, I was introduced to my wife by a muslim who also stood in our wedding. We have first, second and third generation immigrants from five continents in our organization. My issues come from my desire to live my daily life free from government interference. I’ve never been arrested in my life, but now I have to be fingerprinted to keep the HazMat endorsement on my license that I’ve had for ten years. The census wants to know how many toilets I have in my house.
I don’t like the fact that President Obama’s appointing people to positions of power without Congress being able to review and approve the way the Constitution lays out. I don’t like our elected representatives “telling” us why we need this health insurance bill rather than listening to what WE want. They’ve forgotten who they represent. Both sides have. When this happens anywhere else in the world, The government loses the support of the people, It topples, and a new government pops up. But just like so many other things today… The government is “Too big to fail”
Thank you again for the chance to speak out on this forum. And maybe, like here, our two sides can talk to each other rather than shout at each other.
“Mad Hatter”
SMVM Rep
Livingston County
December 22nd, 2009 at 12:11 pm
As we have been discussing the subject as lot as of lately, I felt this was a great follow-up