OBAMAers Dot Com

A Barack Obama Supporters Community Blog

Great Moments in Socialism: the Khmer Rouge

In 1975 after the US abandoned southeast asia to it's fate, the khmer rouge moved into the capital of cambodia, phnom penh. They rounded up the city's urban, middles class population, and marched them into the country side. The formerly bustling city became a ghost town, like in sci fi movies. The people were told it was necessary to "avoid american bombing".

What took place next, from wiki:

Quote:

Money was abolished, books were burned, teachers, merchants, and almost the entire intellectual elite of the country were murdered, to make the agricultural communism, as Pol Pot envisioned it, a reality. The planned relocation to the countryside resulted in the complete halt of almost all economic activity: even schools and hospitals were closed, as well as banks, and industrial and service companies.

During their four years in power, the Khmer Rouge overworked and starved the population, at the same time executing selected groups who had the potential to undermine the new state (including intellectuals or even those that had stereotypical signs of learning, such as glasses) and killing many others for even breaching minor rules.

Cambodians were expected to produce three tons of rice per hectare; before the Khmer Rouge era, the average was only one ton per hectare. The Khmer Rouge forced people to work for 12 hours non-stop, without adequate rest or food. They did not believe in western medicine but instead favoured traditional peasant medicine; many died as a result.

Family relationships not sanctioned by the state were also banned, and family members could be put to death for communicating with each other. In any case, family members were often relocated to different parts of the country with all postal and telephone services abolished.

The total lack of agricultural knowledge by the former city dwellers made famine inevitable. Rural dwellers were often unsympathetic or too frightened to assist them. Such acts as picking wild fruit or berries was seen as "private enterprise" for which the death penalty applied.

The Khmer language has a complex system of usages to define speakers' rank and social status. During the rule of the Khmer Rouge, these usages were abolished. People were encouraged to call each other "friend" or "comrade" (Khmer: មិត្ត; mitt), and to avoid traditional signs of deference such as bowing or folding the hands in salutation, known as samphea.

Language was also transformed in other ways. The Khmer Rouge invented new terms. People were told to "forge" (lot dam) a new revolutionary character, that they were the "instruments" (Khmer: ឧបករណ៍; opokar) of the ruling body known as "Angkar" (Khmer: អង្គការ; pronounced ahngkah; meaning "The Organization"), and that nostalgia for pre-revolutionary times (choeu stek arom, or "memory sickness") could result in execution. Also, rural terms like Mae (Khmer: ម៉ែ; mother) replaced urban terms like Mak (Khmer: ម៉ាក់; mother).
I read elsewhere that execution, for such offenses as stealing a mouthful of food, was accomplished typically by hitting the person on head with some blunt object - it was desired not to waste a bullet.

Cambodia, renamed "Democratic kampuchea ", was invaded (invading a "sovereign state" - obvious Bush types) by Vietnam in 1979, which deposed the socialist regime.

Estimates of the death toll under the khmer rouge range from 1 to 5 million.

Student loans in HC bill-

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/0..._n_497686.html

Great to see that congress is going to outlaw private banks for giving out student loans for college.

I want to hear you liberals defend this. Is this free market? Is this liberty and freedom?

What next? outlaw banks from giving savings accounts?

I don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*) what you say, the liberals and democrats in congress are ruining this country, and people are not going to take much more.

Go ahead, pass this bill, see what happens. It is not going to be pretty.

Congressman Perriello: “If you don’t tie our hands, we’ll keep stealing”

Well, at least he's honest...

Quote:

"If there's one thing i've learned up here, and i didn't really need to come up here to learn it, is the only way to get Congress to balance the budget is to give them no choice. The only way to keep them out of the cookie jar is to give them no choice. Which is why, whether its balanced budget acts or pay as you go legislation or any of that--it's the only thing. If you don't tie our hands, we'll keep stealing."
--- Tom Perriello (D-Va.)
Perriello: 'If you don't tie our hands, we'll keep stealing'
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefi...-keep-stealing

The Olberman Weekend

Nay ... not to be confused with the Sam Peckinpah,spy thriller with
pulp elements,exploring urban paronoia and government abuse ala :
- The Osterman Weekend - ... but it coulda ... shoulda ... woulda
now that Keith " the Kook " Olberman is back from his stay at his
Father's deathbed and personally witnessed the horrors of terminal
illness.I feel for Olberman,in one regard.That being his loss,and slow
removal of his buddy,his Pops,and in such a slow and diminished capacity.
But many Americans,if not near all of us will face that doom or have.
Such is life.
But Tonight,he was at it again.Mounting his rage at an enemy that appears
nightly on MSNBC.Health Insurance companies.They { MSNBC } and Keith
are feverishly working overtime to demonize health insurance companies,
pulling out all the stops,to paint them as the enemy and making slaves
of their clients.It's patently absurd and non-sensical.But it does sell.
On the one hand,Olberman is making devils out of the Insurance Industry,
who take in customers to help alleviate pain and suffering thru managed
health care,for a cost.And asking why Government can't step in and force
out these devils and do it for the betterment of all.That being ALL those
uninsured w/o any health insurance.It's a bogus argument.It's doesn't
pass muster.If Olberman so believes in the States ability to manage universal
health care,why didn't he move his Pops to Canada.Or even get a special
Visa for Cuba,like Michael Moore did.
Because he'd rather use his father as a poster boy for what care he
Father received { via operations and intensive care } by making the
exclusive talking point that there but for the grace of his Rich Son {keith}
his Father goes,like so many in this country unable to afford expensive
treatment.Is this not the height of Fear Mongering.?
Yes,Keith Olberman is rich and helped extend his Father's life to last
breath,sheerly on the ability he could pay for such exclusive treatment.
But in Canada,or Cuba,or France,Germany,those option are very narrow
and uncommon if not banned.
Yet,the Kook still rants on an on an on as if he knows best like Obama and
Pelosi and MSNBC pundits that Government mandated health Care is
a PLUS for ALL Americans.
Am I missing something here.
Like,did the Kook,leave out whole chapters of this scenario.
Maybe that's the mission.Dimocrats like Olberman are so belligerently
tone deaf to anything other than their Statist { Socialist } agenda,where
Democracy is under the thumb of big government run by Democrats,
that even when a pin drops from the pocket of a Republican it shrieks
as if from - Invasion of the Body Snatchers -.

Cheaters beware, at least in the old north state

Quote:

A jury has awarded a North Carolina woman $9 million from her husband's lover after ruling the other woman ruined their marriage.
http://www.fayobserver.com/Articles/2010/03/18/984495

NC is one of a few states that allow the victim (I guess that would be right) of adultery to sue for damages. A jilted spouse can also press charges against a cheating partner.

So, do y'all think this is good law or outdated standards?